The Advantage of Wealth: How partisan success is affected by rising income inequality in the United States
نویسنده
چکیده
Carpenter, Aaron, "The Advantage of Wealth: How partisan success is affected by rising income inequality in the United States" Abstract: After the end of the Second World War, the United States when through a period of great growth. As the economy grew, income inequality also grew within the country. Parallel to this, as income inequality increased, Republicans began to break the stronghold of Democratic congressional control. This begs the question, what happens to politics as income inequality increases in the United States? Can Republican success be explained by increased inequality? In order to answer this question, I theorize that income inequality increases the power of the Republican core support base, while it mitigates the power of the Democratic support base leading to better election results for Republicans. To test to see if income inequality actually increases the success of Republican candidates, I look at congressional districts from the years of 2006-2010 to see if Republicans do better in one election to the next in districts with high-income inequality. I find that Republicans do, in fact, do better in places with high income inequality but only about seven percent better, which is not a substantial amount. I conclude that income inequality might be a small explication to Republican success. Since the end of World War II, the United States has experienced phenomenal economic growth. However, it seems the wealth of such growth has not been shared equally across classes. According to McCarty, Poole, and Rosenthal (2006), a household within the 95th percentile of the income distribution had six times the income to someone 2 in the 25th percentile in 1967. In 2003, however, this number swelled to around eight times that amount (McCarty, Poole, and Rosenthal 2006). With rising income disparity, it is important to ask, how will increased income inequality affect politics or political institutions within the United States? When looking at American politics after World War II, another interesting phenomenon occurs almost parallel to the rising inequality within America. Since World War II, Democrats have had a stark advantage in winning seats in Congress. From 1945 (79th Congress) until today (114th Congress), Republicans have held control of both the show that the Gini index of family income within the United States has been rising since around 1969. Before 1969, the index shows much more variation. Democrats held a majority in Congress, uninterrupted from the 84th Congress all the way …
منابع مشابه
Analyzing the effects of income inequality on public debt in OPEC member states by threshold panel
Abstract One of the major problems of developing governments, such as those of OPEC member states, is the government deficit and rising public debt. One of the reasons for this public debt is government policies faced with income inequalities. The opposite side said that the increased income inequality can lead to capital accumulation and thus increase production and tax payments and reduce go...
متن کاملPartisan Politics, Financial Deregulation, and the New Gilded Age
This paper examines how financial deregulation and the partisan underpinnings of deregulation shaped the path of income inequality in the United States. Using time series data from 1914 to 2010 we assess the effect of partisan politics on financial deregulation and, in turn, the effect of deregulation on income inequality. We find that financial deregulation has generally declined when Democrat...
متن کاملIncome Inequality and Partisan Voting in the United States
Objectives. Income inequality in the United States has risen during the past several decades. Has this produced an increase in partisan voting differences between rich and poor? Methods. We examine trends from the 1940s through the 2000s in the country as a whole and in the states. Results. We find no clear relation between income inequality and class-based voting. Conclusions. Factors such as ...
متن کاملHow Can a Global Social Support System Hope to Achieve Fairer Competiveness?; Comment on “A Global Social Support System: What the International Community Could Learn From the United States’ National Basketball Association”
Ooms et al sets out some good general principles for a global social support system to improve fairer global competitiveness as a result of redistribution. This commentary sets out to summarize some of the conditions that would need to be satisfied for it to level up gradients in inequality through such a social support system, using the National Basketball Association (NBA) example as a point ...
متن کاملAll Men Created Unequal: Trends and Factors of Inequality in the United States
Although the Gross Domestic Product of the United States has been steadily rising since the 1950s, the gap between rich and poor is increasing (see Figure 1). John Kenneth Galbraith explained the importance of inequality when he stated, “People are poverty-stricken when their income, even if adequate for survival, falls markedly behind that of the community. Then they cannot have what the large...
متن کامل